Arbitration & ADR

Conciliation and Mediation in India: A Practical Guide

By Advocate Sharan Jain  · 

Conciliation and Mediation in India: A Practical Guide

Conciliation and mediation in India are two voluntary, confidential ways to settle a dispute without a full court trial, with a neutral third party helping the sides reach their own agreement. The key practical point most people want first: a properly signed settlement reached through either route can be enforced like a court decree — a conciliation settlement under Section 73 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and a mediated settlement agreement under the Mediation Act, 2023. Below we explain what each process is, how it runs step by step, where they differ, and what makes the final agreement binding.

If you are weighing these options for a commercial or family dispute, our alternate dispute resolution practice page sets out how the firm approaches ADR; this guide is the background reading.

What is conciliation and mediation in India?

Both are forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) — methods that sit alongside litigation and arbitration. In each, the parties keep control of the outcome; the neutral does not impose a decision the way a judge or arbitrator does.

  • Conciliation is governed by Part III (Sections 61–81) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. A conciliator actively assists the parties, can make proposals for settlement at any stage (Section 67), and helps draft the terms.
  • Mediation is now governed by the Mediation Act, 2023, India's first dedicated statute on the subject. A mediator facilitates discussion but, as a rule, does not impose or even propose a fixed solution — the parties craft their own.

In everyday Indian practice the two terms are often used loosely and overlap heavily. The Supreme Court itself has observed that the line between the two is thin. The 2023 Act has, in practice, brought much of what used to be called “conciliation” under the broader “mediation” umbrella for civil and commercial matters, while conciliation under the 1996 Act continues to exist as a distinct, named mechanism.

Conciliation under Part III of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Conciliation is the older, statute-backed route. Its core features:

  • How it starts (Section 62): one party sends a written invitation to conciliate; the process begins only when the other side accepts in writing. Silence or refusal means there is no conciliation.
  • The conciliator (Sections 63–64): usually one conciliator, but the parties can agree on two or three. The conciliator is independent and impartial.
  • Conduct (Sections 65–67): the conciliator is not bound by the Code of Civil Procedure or the Evidence Act. They may meet the parties together or separately and can make settlement proposals.
  • Confidentiality (Section 75): matters discussed are kept confidential.
  • The settlement (Sections 73–74): when the parties reach agreement, the conciliator draws up a written settlement agreement, the parties sign it, and the conciliator authenticates it.

Why the settlement matters: Section 73 and Section 74

This is the part clients care about most. Under Section 74, a signed conciliation settlement agreement has the same status and effect as if it were an arbitral award on agreed terms under Section 30. An arbitral award, in turn, is enforceable as a decree of the court under Section 36. In short: a conciliation settlement is treated as final and binding and can be enforced directly — you do not have to re-litigate the dispute to make the other side comply.

Mediation under the Mediation Act, 2023

The Mediation Act, 2023 consolidated and modernised mediation law. Note that some provisions were brought into force in phases and certain rules continue to be notified — so always verify the current commencement status of a specific section before relying on it.

Key features of the Act:

  • Voluntary, with limits: mediation is generally consensual. The Act contemplates pre-litigation mediation for certain matters; the exact scope and any mandatory features should be checked against the current notified text.
  • Mediation Council of India: the Act establishes a Council to register and regulate mediators and mediation service providers.
  • Confidentiality and inadmissibility: what is said in mediation is confidential and generally cannot be used as evidence later.
  • Time discipline: the Act sets an outer time limit for completing mediation (with a permitted extension), encouraging speed.
  • Online mediation: the Act expressly recognises online and tech-enabled mediation.

Settlement agreement enforceability under the Mediation Act

A Mediated Settlement Agreement (MSA) that is authenticated by the mediator and signed by the parties is, under the Act, final, binding and enforceable in the same manner as a judgment or decree of a court. The Act also provides a narrow window to challenge an MSA — broadly on grounds such as fraud, corruption, impersonation, or where the subject matter was not fit for mediation — within a limited period. The exact grounds and limitation period must be read from the current statute.

The process: conciliation and mediation step by step

People searching for the process want a clear sequence. Here is the typical flow for each.

Conciliation process (1996 Act)

  1. One party sends a written invitation to conciliate (Section 62).
  2. The other party accepts in writing — the process now begins.
  3. Parties appoint the conciliator(s) and agree on logistics.
  4. Each side submits a brief statement of its case to the conciliator.
  5. The conciliator holds joint and/or separate sessions, explores interests, and may propose settlement terms.
  6. If agreement is reached, the conciliator drafts the settlement; parties sign; conciliator authenticates (Section 73).
  7. The signed agreement is enforceable as an arbitral award on agreed terms (Section 74).

Mediation process (Mediation Act, 2023)

  1. Parties agree to mediate (by clause, by application, or as contemplated by the Act), or the matter is referred.
  2. A registered/agreed mediator is appointed.
  3. Opening session: the mediator explains the process and confidentiality.
  4. Joint and private sessions (“caucuses”) to surface real interests.
  5. Negotiation and option-building, facilitated by the mediator.
  6. If settled, the Mediated Settlement Agreement is drawn up, signed by parties, and authenticated by the mediator.
  7. The MSA is enforceable as a court judgment/decree.

Conciliation vs mediation vs arbitration vs litigation

FeatureConciliation (A&C Act 1996, Part III)Mediation (Mediation Act 2023)ArbitrationLitigation
Neutral's roleFacilitates and may propose termsFacilitates; usually does not imposeDecides and bindsJudge decides and binds
Who controls outcomeThe partiesThe partiesThe arbitratorThe court
Governing lawA&C Act 1996, ss. 61–81Mediation Act, 2023A&C Act 1996, Parts I/IICPC / relevant statute
ConfidentialYes (s. 75)YesGenerally yesNo (public record)
Final documentSettlement agreementMediated Settlement AgreementArbitral awardJudgment/decree
EnforceabilityAs an arbitral award on agreed terms (ss. 73–74)As a court decreeAs a court decree (s. 36)Directly executable
Typical speedFaster than courtFaster; statutory time limitVariableSlowest

A note on statutory numbering (2023–24 reforms)

The criminal codes were overhauled in 2023–24: the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) was replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, and the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. Conciliation and mediation are civil/commercial mechanisms and are not governed by those codes — but if any document or older judgment you are reading cross-refers to CrPC or IPC sections, treat the numbering as potentially outdated and confirm the current BNSS/BNS equivalent. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the Mediation Act, 2023 themselves were not renumbered by those reforms.

ADR is not just for big contracts. Founders, brand owners and individuals run into it across practice areas. If your dispute touches a brand, our guides on trademark classes in India and IP protection for startups are useful companions. And while ADR is a civil track, readers sometimes confuse it with criminal relief — our explainer on regular bail vs anticipatory bail clears up where the criminal process sits instead. You can read the bare statute, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, on the Government of India's official India Code portal.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between conciliation and mediation in India?

In conciliation under the 1996 Act, the conciliator can actively propose settlement terms; in mediation under the 2023 Act, the mediator facilitates but the parties craft their own solution. Both are voluntary and confidential, and both produce a binding, enforceable settlement.

Is a conciliation settlement agreement enforceable?

Yes. Under Section 74 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, it has the same status and effect as an arbitral award on agreed terms, which is enforceable as a decree of the court.

Is a mediated settlement agreement enforceable in India?

Yes. Under the Mediation Act, 2023, an authenticated Mediated Settlement Agreement is final, binding and enforceable in the same manner as a court judgment or decree, subject to narrow grounds of challenge.

How does the conciliation process begin?

Under Section 62 of the 1996 Act, one party sends a written invitation to conciliate; the process starts only when the other party accepts it in writing.

Is mediation confidential?

Yes. Both conciliation (Section 75 of the 1996 Act) and mediation (under the Mediation Act, 2023) are confidential, and statements made are generally inadmissible as evidence later.

Can a mediated settlement be set aside?

Only on limited statutory grounds — such as fraud, corruption, impersonation, or unsuitable subject matter — and within a limited period prescribed by the Mediation Act, 2023.

Are conciliation and mediation the same as arbitration?

No. In arbitration the arbitrator decides the dispute and the award binds the parties; in conciliation and mediation the parties reach their own agreement and the neutral does not impose a decision.

This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws change and every situation is different; please consult a qualified advocate about your specific matter.

Two named routes

Conciliation runs under Part III of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; mediation now runs under the Mediation Act, 2023.

Who does what

A conciliator may propose settlement terms; a mediator facilitates but the parties craft their own solution. In both, the parties keep control of the outcome.

Both are confidential

What is said is confidential (Section 75 for conciliation; the Mediation Act for mediation) and generally cannot be used as evidence later.

A conciliation settlement is binding

Under Section 74, a signed conciliation settlement has the status of an arbitral award on agreed terms — enforceable as a court decree.

A mediated settlement is binding

An authenticated Mediated Settlement Agreement is enforceable like a court judgment or decree, subject only to narrow challenge grounds such as fraud or impersonation.

How each starts

Conciliation begins only when the other side accepts a written invitation (Section 62); mediation begins by agreement, application, or referral to a registered mediator.

References

  1. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Part III (ss. 61-81; s.62 commencement; ss. 73-74 settlement and enforceability; s.75 confidentiality) — governs conciliation; official text on India Code (Government of India).
  2. Mediation Act, 2023 — India's first dedicated mediation statute; provides that an authenticated Mediated Settlement Agreement is enforceable as a court judgment or decree, subject to narrow challenge grounds; commencement of specific provisions should be verified against the notified text.

Related Legal Services

Dealing with a matter like this? Our Bangalore advocates can help. Explore the relevant practice areas:

SJ

About the Author

Advocate Sharan Jain

Advocate based in Bangalore, practising before the Karnataka High Court and District, Sessions, Consumer and Family courts. Writes on civil, criminal, corporate, family and constitutional law to make Indian law more accessible.

Related Articles

S Jain & Attorneys · Legal Consultation

Have a Legal Question? We're Here to Help.

Our experienced lawyers in Bangalore offer confidential consultations tailored to your specific legal needs.

All matters handled with complete confidentiality and legal discretion.