This is one of the few family law situations where speed genuinely changes the outcome. Once a child has left the country, your options shrink dramatically and become far more expensive.
The protections that already exist
- A minor's passport application normally requires the consent of both parents. A parent can also write to the Passport Office objecting, and any court order should be placed on that file.
- Where a custody or visitation order exists, taking the child abroad in breach of it is contempt, and courts treat it very seriously.
- Immigration authorities can be alerted through a Look Out Circular, which a court can direct where there is a real risk of removal.
What to do if removal is threatened
- Move an urgent application in the pending proceeding, or file a guardianship petition, seeking an injunction restraining removal of the child from the jurisdiction.
- Seek directions to deposit the child's passport with the court, and to restrain the issue of a fresh one.
- Seek a Look Out Circular where the risk is concrete.
- Write to the Regional Passport Office enclosing the order.
India has not acceded to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. That cuts both ways: there is no automatic return mechanism if a child is taken out of India, and equally no automatic return when a child is brought into India. Cross-border custody disputes are therefore fought as fresh proceedings, applying the welfare principle, and the Supreme Court has decided a number of them on comity and the child's best interests rather than any treaty obligation.
If the child has already been taken
Remedies include a habeas corpus petition in the High Court, proceedings under the Guardians and Wards Act, and simultaneous proceedings in the destination country. Act immediately: delay is treated as acquiescence, and the longer a child is settled abroad, the more weight that settlement carries.