Asked by a reader in Bengaluru

The police refuse to give me a copy of the FIR. Am I entitled to one?

Answered by Advocate Sharan Jain··Criminal Defense & Prosecution

Legal Shorts · 77 words

If you are the informant or victim, Section 173(2) BNSS says the recorded information must be supplied promptly and free of cost. Ask in writing and retain the acknowledgement. If you are the accused, ask your lawyer to obtain the FIR through the available police or court process. Section 230 also requires its supply with the police papers at the relevant court stage. A website search is useful, but absence online does not prove no FIR exists.

Short sources checked:

WhatsApp

There are three different entitlements here, and the refusal you are facing is answered by whichever one applies to you.

If you are the informant or the victim

This is the simplest case. The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 provides that a copy of the information recorded under the first information provision shall be given forthwith, free of cost, to the informant or the victim. There is no fee, no application form and no discretion in the wording. A refusal is not a matter of the officer's convenience. Put the request in writing at the counter, ask for an acknowledgement on your copy, and if it is still refused, take the same letter to the Deputy Commissioner of Police or Superintendent of Police the same day.

If you are the accused

An accused is not the informant, so the statutory entitlement above does not apply, and the supply of documents in the ordinary course happens later. In September 2016 the Supreme Court dealt with exactly this gap and issued directions. An accused is entitled to a copy of the first information report at an earlier stage than the stage at which documents are furnished under the procedural code. A person who has reason to suspect that he has been roped into a criminal case may apply, through a representative or agent, for a certified copy before the concerned police officer or the Superintendent of Police on payment of the fee payable for such a copy from the court, and on such an application the copy shall be supplied within twenty four hours. Once the report has been forwarded to the magistrate or a special judge, an application for a certified copy on behalf of the accused is to be answered by the court within two working days.

The same directions deal with publication. Copies of first information reports, unless the offence is sensitive in nature, such as sexual offences, offences relating to insurgency or terrorism, offences under the child sexual offences legislation and offences of that category, are to be uploaded on the police website, or if there is none, on the official website of the State Government, within twenty four hours of registration, so that the accused or anyone connected can download it and move the court. Where there is a connectivity problem because of geographical location or another unavoidable difficulty, the time may be extended to forty eight hours and, for connectivity problems arising from geography, to a maximum of seventy two hours. A decision not to upload is not to be taken by an officer below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police.

Check the website before you argue about the counter.
In a great many Bengaluru cases the report is already online and the trip to the station is unnecessary. Search by the police station and the crime number, or by the date. If it is not there and the offence is not in a sensitive category, the absence is itself a point you can put in your written application, because the direction on uploading is specific about who may decide not to upload.

The stage at which everything is supplied

Where the proceeding has been instituted on a police report, the magistrate must, without delay and in no case beyond fourteen days from the date of production or appearance of the accused, furnish free of cost to the accused, and to the victim if represented by an advocate, a copy of the police report, the first information report, the statements of all persons the prosecution proposes to examine as its witnesses subject to any part excluded on the police officer's request, the confessions and statements recorded by a magistrate, and any other document forwarded with the police report. Voluminous documents may be furnished electronically or made available for inspection, and supply in electronic form counts as due supply. That is the stage at which you get the file, and the fourteen day outer limit is worth quoting when it slips.

The order to follow

  1. Search the police website first. Save the page with the date visible.
  2. Apply in writing. To the officer in charge and, in the same letter or a second one, to the Superintendent of Police or Deputy Commissioner of Police. Keep an acknowledged copy or a registered post receipt.
  3. Apply to the court. Once the report has reached the magistrate, a certified copy application is the reliable route.
  4. Escalate in writing, not by phone. Every step should leave a document.
  5. Use the Right to Information Act as a fallback, keeping in mind that it is slower and that exemptions are commonly claimed for records relating to an ongoing investigation.

Why the copy matters

The first information report fixes the allegation, the date, the sections and the names, and almost every later step depends on reading it. Bail is argued on it. The decision whether the case can be challenged at the threshold is taken on it, and our guide on how a first information report is quashed explains why the text of the report is the starting point of that exercise. If the difficulty is that no report was registered at all, that is a different problem with a different answer, set out in our guide on the zero FIR and how to get a report registered. And where the report names you in a case you say is false, our note on the remedies open to a person falsely accused sets out what follows.

Sources

The law this answer relies on, so you can read it yourself.

  1. 1.Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, official Gazette Read the source
  2. 2.Section 173, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Information in cognizable cases, including registration irrespective of the area where the offence is committed, the supply of a copy forthwith and free of cost to the informant or victim under sub-section (2), the preliminary enquiry route in sub-section (3), and the escalation to the Superintendent of Police in sub-section (4). Read the source
  3. 3.Youth Bar Association of India v Union of India, Supreme Court of India, 7 September 2016. Directions on the supply of a copy of the first information report to the accused within twenty four hours on application to the police officer or the Superintendent of Police, certified copies from the court within two working days, and uploading of first information reports other than in sensitive categories on the police website within twenty four hours of registration. Read the source
  4. 4.Section 230, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Supply to the accused, free of cost and in no case beyond fourteen days from production or appearance, of the police report, the first information report recorded under Section 173, the statements of proposed witnesses, confessions and statements recorded under Section 183, and other documents forwarded with the police report. Read the source
  5. 5.Section 199, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Public servant disobeying a direction under law, including knowingly disobeying a direction prohibiting him from requiring the attendance of a person for the purpose of investigation, or failing to record information under Section 173(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 relating to listed cognizable offences, punishable with rigorous imprisonment of not less than six months and up to two years and fine. Read the source

The short answer's sources were checked on 12 September 2026. Statutes and judgments can change, so check the current position before you act on anything here.

Nothing there yet? Send the question in and it gets answered here.

Related legal service

Dealing with this yourself rather than reading about it? Our Bangalore advocates work in this area.

Go deeper on this

This answer is the short version. These guides cover the same ground in full, with the procedure, the timelines and the leading cases.

SJ

Answered by

Advocate Sharan Jain

Advocate based in Bangalore, practising before the Karnataka High Court and District, Sessions, Consumer and Family courts. Answers public legal questions to make Indian law more accessible.

This answer is general information on Indian law as at August 20, 2026, published for public education. It is not legal advice, it does not take account of your facts, and reading it does not create an advocate-client relationship. Law changes and every case turns on its own circumstances. Please consult a qualified advocate about your own matter.

People also asked

Police Powers & Citizens' Rights

My complaint was recorded as an NCR instead of an FIR. What can I do?

An NCR records a non-cognizable matter, which police generally cannot investigate without a Magistrate's order. Check the facts recorded, not just the heading on the receipt. Under Section 174 BNSS, a case involving several offences is treated as cognizable if at least one is cognizable. If your account was wrongly reduced to a non-cognizable matter, send the complete complaint to the Superintendent of Police and consider the Magistrate route. Keep the NCR and your original complaint together.

Police Powers & Citizens' Rights

The police are simply not investigating. What is my remedy?

Ask for a written status update identifying your complaint or FIR and the investigating officer. Section 193 BNSS requires investigation without unnecessary delay and a progress update to the informant or victim within 90 days. This is not a universal deadline to finish every investigation. If there is persistent inaction, take your earlier complaints and acknowledgements for advice on approaching the Magistrate. A precise account of the missing steps is more useful than repeated informal reminders.

Police Powers & Citizens' Rights

I was never told why I was being arrested. What are my rights?

You are entitled to know the grounds of your arrest. Section 47 BNSS requires the arresting officer to communicate the full particulars of the offence or other grounds promptly. Simply leaving you to guess from a case number is not the safeguard the provision describes. Ask for the arrest papers and tell your lawyer what you were actually told. Raise the failure before the Magistrate at first production and ask that your objection be recorded.

Police Powers & Citizens' Rights

The police leaked my details to the media. Is there a remedy?

Save the report, screenshots and evidence connecting the disclosure to the police. Ask the senior officer to investigate and stop any further improper disclosure. The legal response depends on what was released and whom it identifies: Section 72 BNS specifically restricts identifying victims of listed sexual offences, subject to exceptions. An accused person's name is a different issue. Give your lawyer the actual material so a targeted complaint or court application addresses the disclosure that occurred.

Police Powers & Citizens' Rights

The police refused to let me call my family or a lawyer. What can I do?

Tell the Magistrate at first production and ask for the refusal to be recorded. Section 48 BNSS requires the police to inform a relative, friend or other nominated person of the arrest and place of custody. Section 38 gives an arrested person access to an advocate during interrogation, though not throughout it. Keep a note of whom you asked to contact, when you asked and the response. These details help establish what safeguard was denied.

Police Powers & Citizens' Rights

Can the police stop a peaceful protest or detain protesters?

A peaceful protest can still be subject to lawful restrictions. Ask which written order or legal power is being enforced and record the time if you are taken into custody. Section 163 BNSS permits specified urgent prohibitory orders, while Section 170 allows preventive arrest only where the anticipated cognizable offence cannot otherwise be prevented. That arrest cannot exceed 24 hours without another lawful basis. Challenge the order or detention through the proper process. Avoid assuming either protest or police action is automatically unlawful.

S Jain & Attorneys · Ask Me

Still not the question you had in mind?

Search the column, or send your question in. Questions of general interest are answered here, anonymously, so the next person does not have to ask.