Asked by a founder in Bengaluru

What should a shareholders agreement actually contain?

Answered by Advocate Sharan Jain··Corporate & Commercial Law

Short answer

The clauses that decide who controls the company and how anyone gets out: board composition, reserved matters, pre-emption, tag and drag along, transfer restrictions, deadlock resolution, exit and valuation. It must also be reflected in the articles of association to bind the company.

A shareholders agreement is the document you never look at until the relationship goes wrong, at which point it decides everything. The clauses below are the ones that actually get litigated.

Control

  • Board composition: how many directors each shareholder or class may nominate, quorum, and what happens if a nominee is absent.
  • Reserved matters: the list of decisions that cannot be taken without the consent of specified shareholders. Issuing shares, borrowing above a threshold, related party transactions, changing the business, selling material assets.
  • Information rights: what accounts and management information each shareholder gets, and how often.

Getting shares in and out

  • Transfer restrictions and pre-emption: existing shareholders get first refusal before shares go to an outsider.
  • Tag along: if the majority sells, a minority shareholder can require the buyer to take their shares on the same terms. This is the minority's main protection.
  • Drag along: if a defined majority accepts an offer for the whole company, they can compel the rest to sell. This is what makes the company saleable.
  • Valuation mechanism: who values the shares, on what basis, and whether the valuer's decision is final. Leaving this vague guarantees a dispute.

When it breaks down

  • Deadlock resolution: escalation to founders, then a casting vote, then a buy-sell mechanism such as Russian roulette or a shoot-out.
  • Default and exit: what counts as a material breach, and what the defaulting shareholder loses.
  • Dispute resolution: a clean arbitration clause with seat, venue, number of arbitrators and governing law.
The mistake that voids half the agreement
A shareholders agreement binds the parties who sign it. It does not automatically bind the company or override the articles. Under the Companies Act, 2013 the articles of association are the company's constitution, and courts have refused to enforce SHA restrictions on share transfer that were never incorporated into the articles. Amend the articles to mirror the agreement. This single step is skipped more often than any other.

For a private company

Restrictions on transfer are permissible and indeed expected, since a private company must by definition restrict the right to transfer its shares. That gives more freedom than a public company has.

Nothing there yet? Send the question in and it gets answered here.

Related legal service

Dealing with this yourself rather than reading about it? Our Bangalore advocates work in this area.

Go deeper on this

This answer is the short version. These guides cover the same ground in full, with the procedure, the timelines and the leading cases.

SJ

Answered by

Advocate Sharan Jain

Advocate based in Bangalore, practising before the Karnataka High Court and District, Sessions, Consumer and Family courts. Answers public legal questions to make Indian law more accessible.

This answer is general information on Indian law as at August 9, 2026, published for public education. It is not legal advice, it does not take account of your facts, and reading it does not create an advocate-client relationship. Law changes and every case turns on its own circumstances. Please consult a qualified advocate about your own matter.

People also asked

Corporate & Commercial

Two of us are starting up. What should our founders agreement cover?

Equity split, vesting with a cliff, roles and time commitment, IP assignment to the company, decision-making, what happens when a founder leaves, and non-compete and confidentiality. Vesting and IP assignment are the two that save the company later.

Corporate & Commercial

I am a minority shareholder being frozen out. What are my remedies?

Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 let you petition the NCLT for oppression and mismanagement. The Tribunal can order a buy-out of your shares, set aside prejudicial allotments and agreements, remove directors and regulate the company's future conduct.

Corporate & Commercial

Is a non-compete clause in my contract actually enforceable?

After employment ends, generally not. Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act voids agreements in restraint of trade, and Indian courts do not apply a reasonableness test to post-employment non-competes. During employment it is enforceable, and confidentiality and non-solicitation clauses stand on much firmer ground.

Corporate & Commercial

Is an NDA actually worth anything, or is it just a formality?

It is worth something, but less than people assume. India has no dedicated trade secrets statute, so an NDA is enforced as a contract and through the equitable action for breach of confidence. Its real value is defining what is confidential and making an injunction obtainable.

Corporate & Commercial

Private limited, LLP or proprietorship? Which should I register?

If you will raise external investment or issue equity to employees, a private limited company is effectively the only workable choice. An LLP suits professional and service firms with no funding plans. A proprietorship is cheapest but gives no separation between you and the business.

Corporate & Commercial

My business partner and I want to separate. How do we dissolve the partnership?

By agreement through a dissolution deed, by notice where the partnership is at will, or by court order on grounds such as misconduct or persistent breach. The real work is the settlement of accounts under Sections 48 and 49 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

S Jain & Attorneys · Ask Me

Still not the question you had in mind?

Search the column, or send your question in. Questions of general interest are answered here, anonymously, so the next person does not have to ask.