Asked by a reader in Bengaluru

I am a minority shareholder being frozen out. What are my remedies?

Answered by Advocate Sharan Jain··Corporate & Commercial Law

Short answer

Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 let you petition the NCLT for oppression and mismanagement. The Tribunal can order a buy-out of your shares, set aside prejudicial allotments and agreements, remove directors and regulate the company's future conduct.

The classic pattern is familiar: board meetings you are not told about, a sudden rights issue you cannot fund, salary and consultancy payments to the majority, and no dividend. There is a specific remedy for this.

The provision

Section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013 allows a member to apply to the National Company Law Tribunal where the affairs of the company are being conducted in a manner prejudicial or oppressive to any member, or prejudicial to the public interest or to the interests of the company. Section 242 then gives the Tribunal very wide powers.

What the NCLT can order

  • Purchase of your shares by the company or by the other shareholders, at a valuation the Tribunal determines
  • Setting aside a share allotment or transfer made to dilute you
  • Setting aside or modifying agreements between the company and any person
  • Removal of directors, and appointment of directors or an administrator
  • Regulation of the company's future conduct, and restraint on acts complained of

The threshold to apply

Ordinarily you need members holding not less than one tenth of the issued share capital, or not less than one hundred members or one tenth of the total members, whichever is less. Where the company has no share capital, one fifth of the members. Critically, Section 244 allows the Tribunal to waive this requirement in a fit case, and waiver applications are commonly made and granted where the complaint is serious.

Oppression is conduct, not disappointment
Not every decision you disagree with is oppression. The conduct must be burdensome, harsh and wrongful, and a continuing course of conduct rather than a single act. Isolated mismanagement, or a business decision that turned out badly, will not succeed. Diversion of funds, exclusion from management in a quasi-partnership, and a rights issue engineered purely to dilute, will.

The other routes

  • Class action under Section 245, where members or depositors sue the company, directors or auditors for wrongful conduct.
  • Contract and arbitration, where a shareholders agreement gives you exit, pre-emption or buy-sell rights. Many disputes are resolved here first, and arbitration is often faster.
  • Keep in mind that a claim that is purely about enforcing a contractual buy-out may belong in arbitration rather than before the NCLT.

Nothing there yet? Send the question in and it gets answered here.

Related legal service

Dealing with this yourself rather than reading about it? Our Bangalore advocates work in this area.

SJ

Answered by

Advocate Sharan Jain

Advocate based in Bangalore, practising before the Karnataka High Court and District, Sessions, Consumer and Family courts. Answers public legal questions to make Indian law more accessible.

This answer is general information on Indian law as at August 4, 2026, published for public education. It is not legal advice, it does not take account of your facts, and reading it does not create an advocate-client relationship. Law changes and every case turns on its own circumstances. Please consult a qualified advocate about your own matter.

People also asked

Corporate & Commercial

What should a shareholders agreement actually contain?

The clauses that decide who controls the company and how anyone gets out: board composition, reserved matters, pre-emption, tag and drag along, transfer restrictions, deadlock resolution, exit and valuation. It must also be reflected in the articles of association to bind the company.

Corporate & Commercial

My business partner and I want to separate. How do we dissolve the partnership?

By agreement through a dissolution deed, by notice where the partnership is at will, or by court order on grounds such as misconduct or persistent breach. The real work is the settlement of accounts under Sections 48 and 49 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

Corporate & Commercial

My company has been dormant for years. How do I shut it down properly?

For a dormant company with no liabilities, apply for strike off under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 in Form STK-2. Simply abandoning the company is the expensive option, because non-filing leads to penalties and can disqualify you as a director for five years.

Corporate & Commercial

Two of us are starting up. What should our founders agreement cover?

Equity split, vesting with a cliff, roles and time commitment, IP assignment to the company, decision-making, what happens when a founder leaves, and non-compete and confidentiality. Vesting and IP assignment are the two that save the company later.

Corporate & Commercial

Private limited, LLP or proprietorship? Which should I register?

If you will raise external investment or issue equity to employees, a private limited company is effectively the only workable choice. An LLP suits professional and service firms with no funding plans. A proprietorship is cheapest but gives no separation between you and the business.

Corporate & Commercial

Is a non-compete clause in my contract actually enforceable?

After employment ends, generally not. Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act voids agreements in restraint of trade, and Indian courts do not apply a reasonableness test to post-employment non-competes. During employment it is enforceable, and confidentiality and non-solicitation clauses stand on much firmer ground.

S Jain & Attorneys · Ask Me

Still not the question you had in mind?

Search the column, or send your question in. Questions of general interest are answered here, anonymously, so the next person does not have to ask.